All projects
PROJECT NOTES / AI & MACHINE LEARNING

Summarization · TOPSIS

Choosing a summarizer through multiple criteria.

A comparative study using TOPSIS to rank four pretrained summarization models across quality and efficiency-related criteria.

PythonTransformersROUGETOPSISJupyter
AI & MACHINE LEARNING↗
01Model results
02Decision matrix
03Normalize + weight
04Ideal distances
SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE
01 / THE CHALLENGE

The problem

Choosing a summarization model from one metric ignores the tradeoffs between different kinds of overlap, loss, and output length.

02 / THE APPROACH

How it comes together

A decision matrix compares BART, IT5, Pegasus, and LED. Weighted criteria are normalized, then distance from ideal best and worst alternatives determines the ranking.

03 / UNDER THE HOOD

Follow the flow.

SIMPLIFIED ARCHITECTURE
01Model results
02Decision matrix
03Normalize + weight
04Ideal distances
05Rank
04 / BUILD HIGHLIGHTS

Four pretrained transformer models.

ROUGE-1, ROUGE-2, ROUGE-L, loss, and generation-length criteria.

Explicit criterion weights and benefit/cost directions.

An inspectable TOPSIS score and ranked results.

THE ENGINEERING CHOICE

Why this approach?

Make the weighting assumptions explicit. The resulting ranking reflects this study's chosen criteria and data, rather than claiming a universal best model.

Explore the project’s supporting sources.Project repository
KEEP EXPLORING

Influencer ROAS Analyzer

Vijayshree Vaibhav
YOUR WAY INTO MY WORLD

Vijayshree’s guide.

Projects. Experience. The story behind them.

Portfolio library + Gemini when available
PORTFOLIO GUIDE

Hi! I can help you explore Vijayshree’s projects, experience, and certifications. What would you like to know?

Portfolio sources only · Gemini may process your question.